I also ran a quick Monte Carlo projection , which I am only going to link here because not many people are interested. How much money was originally deposited Equity Curve: It does have a few drawbacks, though, and when I say this I am not only referring to the style of the website, but also to the rather steep price:
WallStreet ASIA Live Performance
The average amount of winning transactions is in the order of 10 to 15 pips: This means that another great benefit of WallStreet Forex Robot 2. We recommend to use WallStreet Forex Robot 2.
This built-in system conceals your stop levels from unfair brokers who trade against their clients. If you choose to use this option, stop levels are executed within the program logic and remain invisible to brokers. This means that you have double protection: In Stealth Mode, stop loss and take profit levels are not displayed to the broker. An emergency stop loss is placed with the broker to protect the trade against disconnection, but Stealth Mode stop loss will be reached before the emergency stop loss.
The team behind WallStreet Forex Robot 2. They spent over hours in developing and refining this powerful tool with one primary goal — to protect your capital and you from unethical brokers: It is disappointing to have to close a position which has made good profits in the past at a loss, or worse — when it hits a stop. We know just how disappointing this is. This is why we protect each WallStreet Forex Robot 2. Alongside this, a special algorithm monitors optimum closure of each position turning a profit.
This protection guards you against transactions at times when your Forex broker has broadened the spread above levels acceptable to you. This is most important, for high pay spreads are among the basic reasons why your trade can turn-in a loss.
This protection defends you from entering positions at prices which are too unfavorable for you in times of high market volatility, or when your broker may attempt to steal additional pips from you. Alongside standard options allowing you to use fixed volumes chosen by you in each deal and standard risk management with proportional lot growth, WallStreet Forex Robot 2. In order to use WallStreet Forex Robot 2. All the backtests performed on history center data were using the default settings for all parameters except the AutoMM which was set to 3.
I will definitely not include it in the forward test, but I will run the other backtests on it as well, for the sake of consistency. To save you the trouble of clicking each balance chart, I made a small table with some relevant data for each backtest.
I proceeded to perform some backtests on Dukascopy tick data next, using fixed spreads equal to those used with the history center data above. The EA settings were also the same: To get relevant results, I set all the trades to lot size to 0. The overall average monthly return is somewhere around 8. Generally, the longer a trade is prolonged, the lower the chance of ending up with a profit from it. The average profit factor is 1. I also ran a quick Monte Carlo projection , which I am only going to link here because not many people are interested.
Finally, I ran some backtests using the real Dukascopy spread and adding a commission of 0. The results look about the same as those obtained on a fixed spread but as expected, due to the commission and variable spread, they were slightly poorer. When adding the commission, this is sensibly larger than the fixed spreads I used so it makes a lot of sense to have results that are slightly worse, but I guess these are more realistic.
Since I made tables for the two other backtest series, I decided to create one for this as well, just in case you want to compare the results:. Initially, I only ran tick data backtests using the Dukascopy data with variable spread but when I noticed I mistakenly ran them with risk 2, making them not easily comparable with the previous backtests, I decided to also run some history center data backtests and some tick data backtests with risk 3, all of which you will find below.
However, when it comes to NZDUSD, even though the backtest seems to indicate a decent performance, the amount of trades taken is a lot lower than for the other pairs, so the backtest is not as relevant as the others. Both new pairs have been added to my forward test a while ago and I will keep them there and let the live performance speak for itself: It does have a few drawbacks, though, and when I say this I am not only referring to the style of the website, but also to the rather steep price: The official forward test seems to be fully in line with my backtest results, so it looks very promising so far.